)]}'
{
  "commit": "a3bf965ef092a989600c47bee1f8bf257bd3ecad",
  "tree": "53cd369548e8bfc70d541246165e3ee1e17f8ad8",
  "parents": [
    "3bfc8221cce2da27725b3cfa92848cd913c0d2e7"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Dan Talayco",
    "email": "dan.talayco@bigswitch.com",
    "time": "Tue Feb 19 23:40:50 2013 -0800"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Dan Talayco",
    "email": "dan.talayco@bigswitch.com",
    "time": "Tue Feb 19 23:40:50 2013 -0800"
  },
  "message": "Break out double tagging tests\n\nIt is not clear in the 1.0 spec what the treatment of double\ntagged packets should be.  It doesn\u0027t really get clearer in\nlater specs, though they are more explicitly discussed in 1.1.\nWildcarding VLAN has the effect on some switches of ignoring\nall VLAN tags.  This is not a clear violation of the spec.  As\na result, this commit proposes to break out the double tagged\nVLAN test cases to a separate test and mark it nonstandard.\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "6e2e573d53c96ee84d35d34abbc597c8a5ecc542",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "tests/pktact.py",
      "new_id": "fe92aa0230c0532c278568c7d59c2fdde069246b",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "tests/pktact.py"
    }
  ]
}